Retirement benefits for government workers continue to receive scrutiny early
in 2012, as budget-cutting once again takes center stage and the presidential
campaign gains momentum.
House and Senate conferees return to Washington on Monday to pick
up the payroll tax cut extension debate -- proposals on the table include
increasing employees' contributions to their pensions -- while a House Oversight
and Government Reform subcommittee plans to hold a hearing Wednesday on
bolstering the federal retirement system. In February, President Obama will
unveil his 2013 budget proposal, which could include a recommendation to increase
the amount of money federal workers pay into their pensions.
And that's just at the federal level. Many states are weighing the potential
savings from slashing government employees' pensions against the backdrop of an
economy that continues to struggle. Whether it's at the state or the federal
level, the debate revolves around a central question: Are public pensions too
generous? The answer to that question is all over the map, figuratively and
literally.
"Defined benefit pensions are without question the most efficient way to
provide retirement security to our nation's working men and women," New York
State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli said Thursday. "In times of fiscal distress,
we should be focusing on ways to strengthen public pension plans, not take them
away."
DiNapoli, along with North Carolina State Treasurer Janet Crowell and other
policy experts, spoke at a National Press Club event that looked at retirement
security issues across the country.
In New York state, where 385,000 government retirees receive pensions, the
average annual pension is about $19,000, he said. In North Carolina, the average
pension is $22,000 per year, Crowell said. According to the nonprofit National
Public Pension Coalition, 30 percent of public employees do not receive Social
Security benefits.
That's less money than what some federal workers receive from their pensions.
Bloomberg reported Wednesday that one in every 125 retired federal
civilian workers receives
more than $100,000 in annual benefits. Among those high earners: former
speaker of the House and current Republican presidential candidate Newt
Gingrich, and retired lawmakers and congressional staff. Those six-figure
recipients, however, accounted for only a fraction of more than 1 million
federal retirees, according to the report.
Federal pensions are calculated using the high-three formula -- the average
basic pay a federal worker earned during any three consecutive years of service.
The average federal salary is about $75,000. In addition, federal workers
covered under the Federal Employees Retirement System receive Social Security
and money from the savings in their 401(k)-style Thrift Savings Plan. There are
legislative proposals floating around that would change the high three to a
high-five formula.
Still, reports of six-figure federal retirement benefits and the $674.2
billion shortfall in federal pension programs amid major deficit-reduction
efforts will keep public pension reform in the spotlight. Hank Kim, executive
director and counsel at the National Conference on Public Employee Retirement
Systems, said money saved from reducing pension benefits should go toward
strengthening a retirement system not necessarily overall deficit reduction.
"We've seen manageable, run-of-the-mill problems with these [state] systems
shamefully blown up into epic proportions, all so that officials have an excuse
to slash the pensions of hardworking Americans in the name of balancing the
budget," he said.
Kim, whose trade association deals with state pension plans and issues,
believes the public pension model is sustainable and could be extended to the
private sector.
BY NATIONAL JOURNAL GROUP, INC. ALL RIGHTS
RESERVED.